There has been much talk and media concern about the number of jobs that will be lost in the coming years through the AI revolution. The good news is that architects are way down the list at only a 2% likelihood
However, technical staff are not going to be as lucky. A situation I have forecast for many years:
There is a problem though. Because the research was conducted in the the USA, where architects require a similar level of knowledge, skills, education and experience as here in the UK, the idiots (for the BBC) who translated that research into English failed to realise/understand that Chartered Architectural Technologists (there are not, and no need for, any in the USA) are NOT architects, or as qualified, and therefore out of ignorance included them in the chart as architects at No.338 as less than 2% likely to be automated:
Any Chartered Architectural Technologist would, currently, need to re-qualifiy from the beginning if they wanted to be an architect. They should therefore obviously be listed a lot nearer technicians with whom they share educational qualifications, knowledge and skills:
My advice to anybody who has just received their "A" results, or about to start on "A" levels, who wants a career 'in architecture' that the only career 'in architecture' with a future is that of architect. If you don't fancy University or are not 'academically' minded there are both part-time and apprenticeship course routes into the profession.
Open Plan? Cellular? Flexible? Tied to a computer or phone? Always in meetings? Have laptop will travel? There are lots of different types of office space required for a modern business.
Tied to a production line or workstation? Everything automated and robotised? Sat on checkout for hours? Sat on a forklift moving around in a large shed? Everything made in a shed or China? Retail and factory / industrial workplaces are very varied too.
I could go on. But. The world is changing and many businesses will need to change very rapidly very soon. Manufacturing needs fewer people, retail does not require checkouts and tills (see Amazon's new shop in the USA!). Software can do many mundane office jobs too. The buildings and interiors that most businesses occupy will therefore need to change too ahead of that inevitable change.
Town centres offer most of the benefits and flexibility that will be required. Why work on the edge of town surrounded by a sea of cars? Why not work where there are cafes to meet in, shops to buy lunch, most bus routes go there so there is less need for the car. The railway station is usually nearer too, there are gyms to 'work out' in, etc etc. Guess what, town centres also contain empty floorspace above the high rental retail space at ground level. If the facilities of a town centre are used less floor space is needed for your business too (on top of the 'leaner' workforce).
Kettering could be at the forefront of such a shift in business practices. It has a town centre that buses travel to, it has a railway station, it has cafes and it has spare floor space. Not only that Kettering has hotels, a conference centre, Wicksteed Park, stately homes and open countryside within walking distance. Not many places can say that. With the new 'urban extension' Kettering deserves a town centre that can develop and grow to cater for an increasing population in an organic way through incremental change rather than a massive 'comprehensive redevelopment scheme' that can never be justified in terms of finance, sustainability, aesthetics or common sense. With the good rail service to London we are only an hour from St.Pancras / Kings Cross, one of the fastest growing areas of London. Kettering is nearer to it in terms of travel time than many places inside the M25.
KR.eativ: Architects is therefore looking for the businesses that want to rethink the way they work and the location they want to work in. We are seeking the owners of the buildings with the 'spare' floorspace that could become an income for them.
Property if left devoid of investment becomes unsuitable for continued use and derelict. That applies to building plots and land as well as buildings. Investment in refurbishment and new building projects can lower running costs and improve living and working environments.
Many office workplaces are based in wholly cellular former domestic buildings or tired open plan offices. Neither are particularly suited to modern working practices that often need a mix of the two to accommodate more flexible / informal working practices that often suit businesses better. Even many new workplace buildings are not designed with end-users in mind!
Similarly, many existing homes are better suited to rapidly declining lifestyles with the number of rooms being considered important by house builders and estate agents. In actual fact it is the quality of rooms that is more important these days. A 1930s Kitchen can rarely accommodate modern appliances let alone more than one person, whereas modern lifestyles often require the cooking, dining and living spaces to be much better connected. It is a waste of valuable 'real estate' to reserve a room for use on high days and holidays only as a 'front parlour'. Yet even many new homes are built by house builders that way.
Most existing buildings are capable of being altered to reduce their use of energy, the cost of the work being covered by the drop in running costs.
Bringing empty floors and roof spaces into use can increase the commercial income of property or allow larger homes without building a ground floor extensions eating into a small garden. Extending a property out into a larger garden can remove the need to move and all the costs that would involve.
So if you, your family / business or your clients would benefit from your property being increased in value functionally, as well as financially, please get in touch. That is what architects do, add value and increase possible incomes from property. KR.eativ: Architects is an RIBA Chartered Practice and a member of the Association of Self Build Architects (ASBA).