03 Mar 200303 – 5 Reasons not to use an Architect
It is very important to understand the difference between an architect and other building designers. Anyone can design a building, there are no restrictions in the UK (unlike most other parts of the developed World) no qualifications are required. BUT the long training that an architect undertakes for a minimum of seven years resulting in qualifications to above masters degree level means we offer a high value professional service backed by all sorts of measures to protect you, our client. We are also trained to meet your needs over and above your stated ‘wants’.
It is therefore very important for us to be on the ‘same wavelength’ as you in order to get ‘behind’ what you say, and share your vision, to access the requirements that you need though our wide knowledge of building design.
There are therefore a number of things that you need to consider before appointing an architect, other than the obvious one which is are they an architect or an un(der)qualified person acting illegally?
The reasons NOT to use an architect are:
One – If you want the cheapest possible solution such that it is poor design and bad solution to your requirements
Working through the options with you can take 2 or 3 options and variations over a couple of Months before a satisfactory solution to take forward is reached – RIBA Stages 0 – 2.
Two – If you do not care about saving money through having lower running costs
All KR.eativ: Architects designs are both aesthetically stunning (as far as is permitted under planning legislation) and technically designed to minimise energy demand / use. We also design for long term use and try to include the ability to adapt the building throughout that, money saving, longer life.
Three – If you want an ‘off the shelf’ short term building not tailored to your requirements
Despite that most existing buildings can be re-purposed to meet your requirements more exactly and increase a building’s longer life in a way that has lower energy demands.
Four – If you want a low quality building without the 10% – 12% added value that an architect can give to any building project.
It has been shown that the extra value added by an architect, such as KR.eativ: Architects Ltd, is often more than the cost of commissioning us. A poor quality cheap building will also have higher running costs and a shorter lifespan.
Five – If you want to use a ‘design and build’ contract that meets the needs of the developer rather than the end-user
We can design those, and quite willing to do so, but they are usually buildings that the end-users need to adapt to better suit their needs after they have moved in. However ‘design and build’ can work for buildings that are not required to be bespoke and the end-users tend to be short term occupants.